According to @StockMKTNewz, BlackRock’s assets under management stand at $14.04 trillion, up from $4.6 trillion in 2015. Source: @StockMKTNewz (Jan 18, 2026). This equals a $9.44 trillion increase and an estimated 10.7% compound annual growth rate over 2015–2026, based on the cited figures. Source: calculation from @StockMKTNewz data (Jan 18, 2026). Management and advisory fees at BlackRock primarily scale with average AUM, tying this growth directly to BLK’s revenue base for trading and valuation analysis. Source: BlackRock 2023 Form 10-K. For crypto markets, BlackRock sponsors the iShares Bitcoin Trust IBIT, a US spot BTC ETF, so AUM scale and distribution breadth provide context for BTC-linked ETF flows. Source: BlackRock product disclosures.

According to @StockMKTNewz, BlackRock (BLK) now has $13.5 trillion in assets under management, up from $12.5 trillion last quarter, a $1.0 trillion increase of roughly 8% quarter over quarter (source: @StockMKTNewz on X, Oct 14, 2025). Because BlackRock’s investment advisory and administration fees are primarily based on AUM, the higher base increases fee-revenue sensitivity that traders often factor into BLK’s near-term pricing around earnings and guidance (source: BlackRock 2023 Form 10-K). For crypto, BlackRock sponsors the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), a U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF that provides BTC exposure, making the firm’s scale relevant when monitoring ETF distribution and liquidity metrics tied to BTC market participation (source: BlackRock iShares IBIT product page). Traders can anchor on the $13.5T headline and +$1T QoQ delta as catalysts for BLK and use them as context when tracking IBIT flows alongside BTC spot volumes during U.S. hours (source: @StockMKTNewz on X, Oct 14, 2025; BlackRock iShares IBIT product page).

According to Crypto Rover, BlackRock's Assets Under Management (AUM) on Ethereum have increased by 364.65% year-to-date, despite Ethereum's price declining by 52.36% in the same period. This incongruity suggests potential trading opportunities as institutional interest seems to diverge from market trends, raising questions about Ethereum's future price movements.